Penggunaan Istilah Asing dalam Bahasa Gaul Kaum Milenial di Media Komunikasi Virtual

  • Tri Kristianti Program Studi Teknik Elektro Fakultas Teknik Universitas Wisnuwardhana

Abstract

Over the years, technology has developed and revolutionized our world and daily lives. It becomes the most crucial part in our lives. The amazing tools and resources have been created, putting useful information in our fingertips. Through instant messaging apps and social media platforms, technology’s advancements have provided quicker ways to communicate. 

The term “media” has changed the digital technology which previously refers to the necessity of news platform. Any company that helps pass information across the globe, including social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter is now called as a media company. To reinforce this circumstance, the virtual communication platforms like Instagram and TikTok become very popular among the millennial youth. They provided any contents with variety themes and current issues to catch their viewers’ attention. The content creators create particular slang language which consist of acronyms or abbreviations and mostly written in English.

This research is descriptive qualitative type. This research aims to analyze the use of foreign language (English) in shortening slang abbreviations among the millennials youth while communicating in virtual communication media. While phenomenology approach is used to reveal the commonality of a lived experience in using the slang language within millennials youth. The result indicated there are 70 popular words that consist of 66 abbreviations and 4 numeronyms in the slang vocabulary of the millennials used to communicate in virtual communication media; TikTok and Instagram.

References

Achmad, Z. A., Arviani, H., & Santoso, N. R. (2021). The Sanak-Kadang Jodhipati: A new form of virtual radio listeners Community. Jurnal ASPIKOM, 6(1), 94.

Aji, W. N., & Setiyadi, D. B. P. (2020). Aplikasi Tik Tok sebagai media pembelajaran keterampilan bersastra. Metafora, 6(2), 147–157, http://dx.doi.org/10.30595/mtf.v6i1.7824.

A. Muri Yusuf. 2017. Metode Penelitian: Kualitatif, Kuantutatif, dan Penelitian Gabungan. Jakarta: Kencana.

Ardila, Regina Rendi, Ansellyta Agustine, and Rosi Rosi. 2018. Analisis Tingkat Interferensi Bahasa Indonesia Pada Anak Usia 12 Tahun Berdasarkan Perbedaan Latar Belakang Bahasa Orang Tua. Parole (Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia). 1 (4): 651-658.

Baym, Nancy. (2015). Social Media and the Struggle for Society. SAGE Journals.

Bercovici, J. (2010, December 9). Who coined social media? Web pioneers compete for credit. Forbes. Retrieved from http:// www.forbes.com/sites/jeffbercovici/2010/12/09/who-coinedsocial-media-web-pioneers-compete-for-credit/2/

Chaer. A. 2007. Linguistik Umum cetakan ketiga. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Chaer. A. 2015. Morfologi Bahasa Indonesia: Pendekatan Proses. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Ferdiansyah, M. (2020). Jumlah unduhan Tiktok kalahkan Facebook dan Instagram. https://techno.okezone.com/read/2020/01/16/207/2153835/jumlah-unduhan tiktok kalahkan-facebook-dan Instagram.

Firmansyah, Dida. 2018. Analysis of Language Skills in Primary School Children (Study Development Of Child Psychology Of Language). PrimaryEdu - Journal of Primary Education. 2 (1): 35-40.

Izza, Jamalul. Peluang Penetrasi Internet dan dan Tantangan Regulasi Daerah. Buletin APJII Edisi 79 Januari 2021 https://apjii.or.id/downfile/file/BULETINAPJIIEDISI79Januari20211.pdf.

KBBI V. (2020). Hasil pencarian arti kata estetika. Retrieved 19 May 2021, https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/estetika.

Kridalaksana, Harimurti. 1999. Kamus Linguistik. Jakarta: PT Gramedia

McKean, E. (2009). Redefining definition. Retrieved 22 June 2021 https://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/20/ magazine/20FOB-onlanguage-t.html

Meoliono, M Anton. 1993. Tata Bahasa Baku Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Miles, Matthew B. & A. Michael Huberman. 2009. Analisis Data Kuaalitatif. Jakarta: UI.Press.

Pernandi, I. (2018). Studi kajian interaksionisme simbolik pondok pesantren Misbahulkhoir Bojong Purwakarta. MENDIDIK: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 4(1), 1–10. doi:10.30653/003.201841.36

Ramadhan, B. (2020). Data Internet di Indonesia dan Perilakunya Tahun 2020. https://teknoia.com/data-internet-diindonesia-dan-perilakunya 880c7bc7cd19?gi=b52934a64642.

Sari, Beta Puspa. 2015. “Dampak Penggunaan Bahasa Gaul di Kalangan Remaja Terhadap Bahasa Indonesia”. Dalam Prosiding Seminar Nasional Bulan Bahasa UNIB 2015, halaman 2-5.

Sapir, Edward. 1949. Language. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

Sasrwono, Sarlito Wirawan. 2004. Psikologi Remaja. Jakarta: CV Rajawali.

Suratnoaji, C., Arianto, I. D., & Sumardjijati. (2018). Strength map of presidential candidates 2019 in Indonesia based on a nodeXL analysis of big data from twitter. Asian Journal for Public Opinion Research, 6(1), 31–38. doi:10.15206/ajpor.2018.6.1.31

Tarigan, Henry Guntur .2008. Membaca Sebagai Suatu keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.

Tenore, M. J. (2013). 5 ways that social media benefits writing and language - Poynter. Retrieved 19 June 2021, from https://www.poynter.org/reporting editing/2013/5-ways-that-social media-benefits-writing-the-english language/

Wibowo, Wahyu. 2003. Manajemen Bahasa. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Published
2022-01-13
How to Cite
Kristianti, T. (2022). Penggunaan Istilah Asing dalam Bahasa Gaul Kaum Milenial di Media Komunikasi Virtual. Jurnal Likhitaprajna, 23(2), 152-160. https://doi.org/10.37303/likhitaprajna.v23i2.200
Section
Articles